Forum: The Resurrectionists
+ Reply to Thread
Results 51 to 60 of 102
Thread: Three Seamus Changes... Please?
-
08-07-2012, 07:33 AM #51
-
08-07-2012, 08:17 AM #52
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Milford, Derbyshire, England
- Posts
- 675
- Thanks
- 272
Thanked 36 Times in 29 Posts
Please visit my painting blog :D http://wills-tabletop-gaming-blog.blogspot.co.uk/
Im a sucker for underrated models - next on the table = Copy cat killer :)
-
08-07-2012, 09:21 AM #53Whippersnappers!
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- Naperville, IL.
- Posts
- 1,774
- Thanks
- 195
Thanked 191 Times in 141 Posts
If you can make the enemy master insignificant, that could be cool...
But you are standing in melee with them for that trigger. Personally, I would rather be McMourning standing next to the enemy master because them being insignificant is not as cool as them being dead.
I can appreciate that we all like Seamus. That's why there are 5 pages of discussion on him in less than a day. But, it does sort of feel like people are making cases for "Seamus can do this" as being the same as "there is no rezzer master that could do this better than Seamus".
But, maybe I am wrong...
How about this. If the original changes, or some combination of changes discussed since the OP were implemented, would someone win Gencon playing Seamus at least half his games?Last edited by Gruesome; 08-07-2012 at 10:18 AM.
I think therefore I... BRAINS!
-- Zombie Descartes
-
08-07-2012, 10:22 AM #54
I'm in the camp that a cache of 4, necrotic ministrations working on everything (come on, the guy can get a hardon from a zombie doing it's final thud but not from a spirit howling in despair or a soulless becoming a bunch of smoke or a construct going out with a satisfying kaboom?) and taking out the gun from Live for Pain. That and changing his scheme into something doable, those 4 things wuld give him a big fat spike. He wouldn't be Kirai, but at least I would look at him with a much better eye than right now, recently started McMourning and good god the difference in efficiency between the two is outright baffling.
-
08-07-2012, 02:13 PM #55
After he does excessive bleeding, the belle that he womanizered can lure him out of the melee. And if the enemy master has activated already, that is even better.
Him and McM still achieve the strat, just by different means. Yes if McM gets a hold of it, there is a good chance it will be dead after he is finished. Seamus can just make it insignificant, STILL denying 4vp. McM after a flurry of attacks might miss a couple and then what? He missed a couple and the enemy master is still alive. All Seamus needs is a high crow and a high flip on a soulstone to get a trigger that just flat out denies 4vp.
Both Methods are effective.Malifaux 2E? And you're actually changing things that should have been changed a while ago?
I can smell the butthurt from here.
-
08-07-2012, 03:44 PM #56La Belle Mort
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Oxford, Mississippi
- Posts
- 3,078
- Thanks
- 94
Thanked 274 Times in 193 Posts
Not much survives a channeled + SS cast of dissection however.
-
08-07-2012, 04:11 PM #57Founder of the Levi Punch Rank: Twisted
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Macomb, MI - Gamers Gauntlet
- Posts
- 366
- Thanks
- 9
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Cheers! Alongside a Levi Punch I fear getting hit by Dissection. Granted you need to hit, but either of them might as well say
Useless/Meh/Holy crap! on their damage profile. The only other things I'm wary of are Slumber Trigger from Coppelius and Mental Anguish from Pandora.Last edited by DarcXON; 08-07-2012 at 04:13 PM.
-
08-07-2012, 04:12 PM #58
Seconded (or thirded or fourthed or whatever).
I like these changes. They are simple, elegant, and provide much more benefit than they first appear to.
Cache 5 would be nice (hey, so would cache 8, but that'll never happen), but I think 4 would be reasonable. I don't feel that Seamus is meant to be a "huge ranged threat," so I don't really like the idea of removing the 1 shot limit from the pistol, mostly as an aesthetic thing. As far as Anathema goes, I really don't want to ever see that on something that isn't an avatar. Some other reworking of Terrifying or Morale duels I would look at, but I think that Anathema is something that should be reserved to keep avatars special."The ability to get up after a defeat is far more admirable than the ability to never lose."
-
11-12-2012, 11:00 AM #59Dead man walking Rank: Wyrd
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Tacoma, Washington
- Posts
- 623
- Thanks
- 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
I dunno about all that...minions maybe...but if it's contain power...
Against most masters, who can also use SS, getting a severe is not likely. Most of the time you will be at a :-flip and that is no bueno for McM.
Also what if you do get 10 damage, most of the time they will burn a SS and mitigate it down. Then that lethal damage is now mean...but survivable while the dear doctor is very tired and no longer activated.
-
11-12-2012, 11:24 AM #60
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Posts
- 1,029
- Thanks
- 10
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
I don't think they will make an errata to buff a model. Nerfing for balance is one thing, but buffing opens a whole can of worms rules wise, because then they would be expected to do it for all master eventually.
But I do see them making a new models to boost a crew (ie Snowstorm and Silent one for Raspy). A 1 SS totem that lets you bring your Avatar for free, counts as copy cat killer for Scheme purposes, and will survive a manifest would fit this. Currently I never see the Copycat killer in play, and they've already made a second totem for Ramos to fix him.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 51 to 60 of 102
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)




3 Anathema -> 14
Reply With Quote
