PDA

View Full Version : I CAN'T upload photos anymore ...HELP !!!!!!!!


Moavoamoatu
06-28-2008, 11:02 AM
I spent a lot of time taking photos and now I can't upload them in the Dirty Laundry gallery.

My photo was 1.7 Mo and now it is less than 800 Ko and I still can't upload it : I get this message error :

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 3200 bytes) in /home/wyrd/public_html/photopost/image-inc.php on line 135

If I can't post it in the gallery I will post it on the forum....I am really upset so please try to fix this f..... mess !!!!
Nathan Caroland
06-28-2008, 11:11 AM
800kb is too large, thus the site is rejecting it. We've got it stated that it'll take 350k though I have boosted it to 500kb in some areas. Anything more and that's just too damn huge as frankly there is no reason to put up a near 1meg image.

Sorry Eric, but no mess here to fix.
Ritual
06-28-2008, 11:15 AM
I posted in the other thread, but I repeat what I said there here as well. Do you really need the photos to be that large? I use the Save For Web function in PS and rarely need more than 200 kb, even for multi-angle photo montages, and still get good quality pictures.
Moavoamoatu
06-28-2008, 11:21 AM
Thanks guys but my previous IP entries were between 700 ko and 800 ko and I got no problem at all to upload them.

As my photos are crappy, I will lose a lot on compression....at least I will be freed definitely from IP :D
Ritual
06-28-2008, 11:34 AM
Have you tried using the Save For Web function? It is really, really good. You need to compress it a LOT before you see any substantial quality loss.
Moavoamoatu
06-28-2008, 11:37 AM
I compressed it up to 255 ko and I still get an error message :

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 3200 bytes) in /home/wyrd/public_html/photopost/image-inc.php on line 135
Moavoamoatu
06-28-2008, 11:37 AM
Have you tried using the Save For Web function? It is really, really good. You need to compress it a LOT before you see any substantial quality loss.

With Photoshop ???
Ritual
06-28-2008, 11:52 AM
Yep.
Nathan Caroland
06-28-2008, 01:26 PM
I'll take a look into it tonight.
Moavoamoatu
06-28-2008, 02:02 PM
I'll take a look into it tonight.

No, it was my fault, I didn't notice my photo was 1024 wide instead of 800. You can delete this thread if you want Nathan.

Just take time to answer my last PMs ,)

I lost a lot of time because of my own mistake but now I cooled down.
Brushmistress
06-30-2008, 04:23 PM
It's funny Moa, that I had the same thing happen to me with an auction listing service once. I was so peeved at the website until I realized all my pics were over 150kb, which was the limit.
Moavoamoatu
06-30-2008, 04:47 PM
It's funny Moa, that I had the same thing happen to me with an auction listing service once. I was so peeved at the website until I realized all my pics were over 150kb, which was the limit.

Yep I was so stressed that I didn't notice the size.
Nathan Caroland
06-30-2008, 06:33 PM
Soon as I get a moment I'm going to go in there and edit the gallery to make things a bit more obvious with some of the rules for uploading as well as WHERE to upload.

My biggest peeve with this software.
Moavoamoatu
06-30-2008, 07:37 PM
Soon as I get a moment I'm going to go in there and edit the gallery to make things a bit more obvious with some of the rules for uploading as well as WHERE to upload.

My biggest peeve with this software.

That's fine now : 800 wide and 300k :D